Showing posts with label plagiarism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label plagiarism. Show all posts

Friday, April 13, 2012

How theft by newspapers affects professional writers

guest essay by Lawrence Gooley

I make my living selling what I write and publishing books for others as well. If you have a job, your healthcare, gas money, mortgage, heating, electricity, phone, internet, TV, groceries … all of it and more comes from your paycheck. My “paycheck” comes from stories and books that I sell. I create each one and have to sell each one.

Many of my stories appear in full or are excerpted on Adirondack Almanack and NY History Blog as per my agreement with those entities, and those works also appear as chapters in my books. My recent book, Adirondack & North Country Gold: 50+ New & True Stories You’re Sure to Love, is an example, containing 51 of my original works. Before summer, I’ll be releasing a similar collection of true murder stories. When those stories appear online, it is not for public reuse. It is copyright protected material, and is my livelihood.

A few years ago, I exchanged emails for two months with a newspaper editor (representing several newspapers and editors). The discussion was about hiring me to write history stories for their publications on a weekly basis. They reviewed samples and expressed great interest (and I retain copies of those communications). However, in the end, the economic downturn was given as the reason they couldn’t hire at that time.

Recently, two of my pieces in their entirety appeared in those same newspapers, both in print and online. My name is mentioned with the articles, but there were no links to me in the online version and there was no other mention of my input. Nothing … just “by Lawrence P. Gooley.” I received no payment, and wouldn’t even know I had been “robbed” had I not found it myself by searching online. The editor obviously knew that Lawrence P. Gooley had not sent them that article for publication, and they in fact include mention of the person who sent it to them. Due diligence, and it’s quite simple, is to contact the author. His name, after all, was on the piece. In this case, the person who alerted them to the piece received as much credit as the actual author who did all the research and writing.

In an instance like that, I’ll contact the source, explain my position, and open the possibility of paying me. If that doesn’t work, I’m prepared to go to small claims court, where I will present the evidence and ask for damages encompassing payment for the article, PLUS the time required to communicate in sometimes lengthy emails, and the cost of gas to travel back and forth to court. I often work 12-18 hour days, and time is money. Dealing with theft of materials carries a financial cost for me.

Taking my material for their own use is no different from taking $200 out of my wallet. It is my work, and considerable expense is involved in producing it, including memberships to a number of newspaper archives, genealogical sites, and history sites. For one story, often 50 or more sources provide bits of information, after which the story has to be composed and written professionally. It’s then up to me to market, sell, and protect my work, a very time-consuming and difficult process.

I have three such cases to deal with at the moment. I’ve worked at various jobs over the years, and this is nothing different than someone else getting paid for work that they did not do. What’s worse is that often the people doing this are writers and editors, the very people who are fully aware that it is wrong and illegal. They KNOW a particular piece is not theirs, but decide to take it anyway, and it is used in their publication for financial gain, whether by selling the newspaper or selling advertising. There’s a word for that: theft. Sometimes it’s called “an accident,” which actually means the editor didn’t bother to check the source. In my case, I’m pretty easy to find. In other cases, it’s intentional, which is just plain wrong.


Lawrence Gooley operates Bloated Toe Enterprises, offering book publishing and web design, and features the North Country Store, an online vendor of regional books and other products. An award-winning author, he will soon release his eleventh book, and is a weekly contributor to the Adirondack Almanack and New York History blogs.

Thursday, April 12, 2012

Piracy is not the sincerest form of flattery (or: quit stealing our stuff)

Plagiarism, n.: an act or instance of using or closely imitating the language and thoughts of another author without authorization and the representation of that author's work as one's own, as by not crediting the original author. (From: dictionary.com)

The above is an example of how one properly attributes work created by another. This straight forward action is something one is typically taught in high school English class.

Yet for the second time in less than a year, a local newspaper has plagiarized work from this blog. Last June, the Glens Falls Chronicle ripped off a Mark Wilson contribution regarding the Post-Star.When confronted, the weekly's boss Mark Frost agreed to credit Wilson.

Last week, Denton Publications (which publishes the Adirondack Journal and several other hyperlocal weeklies) did the exact same thing.

On March 29, Wilson published this piece breaking the news about the Glens Falls' dailies culling of editorial staff.

On April 3, a source made me aware of this online article from Denton that looked astonishingly similar to Wilson's piece... except for one key attribute: Wilson's name. The print edition ran the same article.

To make matters worse, The Chronicle ran a piece by Mark Frost entirely based on (unattributed) Denton's article, unwittingly echoing the fiction that it was their work. In an email, Frost said he didn't know Wilson had anything to do with it (which surely would've been true if he only read the print edition or not seen the updated online piece) and that he'd run a clarification as well.

(Update: today's edition of The Chronicle does NOT appear to have the promised clarification)

After much wrangling, Denton finally agreed to properly attribute its online article. In an email, Denton's Thom Randall assured me a correction would run in the print edition as well.

The policy of this blog is stated very clearly on the main page: Essays are available for re-print only with the explicit permission of the publisher. Contact mofycbsj @ yahoo.com 

Excerpts of blog posts can be used, but they *must*, with no exceptions, contain proper attribution. Proper attribution consists of the author (by default: me, Brian, except where indicated otherwise) and the name and URL of this blog (Musings of a (Fairly) Young Contrarian: mofyc.blogspot.com)

What's most interesting is this. Both Frost and Randall accepted to give attribution, but only once they were confronted. Were these honest mistakes or did they think they wouldn't get caught? Only they can answer.


Regardless, these incidents of piracy represent black eyes for the sort of local, independent journalism many want. It's ironic: on the public media programs about journalism, a common complaint is about bloggers  stealing stuff from newspapers and other mainstream media outlets. They never talk much about newspapers stealing stuff from blogs. I'm starting to suspect it happens more often than most people realize... or care to admit.

Also see: a prominent regional writer and author recounts his experiences of newspapers trying to steal his stuff.